Sprinklers Are a Risk
- Share via
I am a nine-year resident of Glendale. I purchased a very small home in the La Crescenta area with the hope of adding onto the house when I could afford to do so. Now that I can, I am told that I must install fire sprinklers, of all things, in my entire house.
Aside from the cost burden--about $4,000, or 7% of the entire budget--I am vehemently opposed to sprinklers in single-family residences as they are a property damage hazard. If an earthquake causes them to discharge, everything I own would be destroyed, and there is no insurance coverage for it (I am an insurance broker and I know this as a fact). City government has gone way overboard here.
BRUCE C. NEWSOM
Glendale
Letters must include the writer’s name, address and daytime telephone number and should be sent to the Real Estate Editor, Los Angeles Times, 202 W. 1st St., Los Angeles, CA 90012 or faxed to Real Estate Editor at (213) 237-4712 or E-mailed to Real.Estate@LA Times.com. Letters may be edited for reasons of space and clarity.
More to Read
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.